Pay Cut at UMDNJ?
We Don't Think So! Here's How You Can Help
The “wage reopener” negotiations between
our union HPAE Local 5094 and UMDNJ have been
going extremely slow. The University
spokesperson repeats at every meeting that they
are in poor shape financially. Management
has proposed zero raises for the next two years
and a 1.5% payment for health benefits which
would result in a salary reduction. Your
negotiating committee would like to use the vast
knowledge and experience of the membership at
UMDNJ to help our effort in gaining a fair
increase in salary for 2008 and 2009.
We are appealing to each of you to
contribute your ideas on how UMDNJ could cut
waste and/or increase revenues. If you have
knowledge of any unnecessary and wasteful
practices, we want to hear from you. This is
where each member can help those of us who are
sitting face to face with management on a
regular basis. Your suggestions will assist all
of us to keep moving forward.
Will you take just a few minutes to fill
out our survey?
Click here for survey
HPAE Local 5094 Contract
Update
Contract Negotiations Continue
Still waiting for a wage proposal from management
[Note: This is the on-line edition of the bulletin
that was distributed at our latest membership
meetings].
There have been two negotiation sessions since we
published the last bulletin. The first, held on May
30th, following our successful “HPAE Button Day”
earlier in the week. The atmosphere was more
business like than in previous sessions. The
meeting started with the UMDNJ negotiator, Labor
Relations Director Abdel Kanan, restating that the
University was not yet ready to make a wage offer
and said that when the NJ State Budget gets
finalized, the University would make an economic
offer. We submitted our final proposals regarding
on-call pay for salaried employees, shift
differential pay for salaried employees and bumping
rights for Research positions. The University asked
for more information on our proposal for a
supplemental Retirement Medical Trust Fund and we
agreed to bring in a Trustee of the Fund in a future
session.
At the most recent negotiating session held on June
19, still prior to the NJ State budget being finalized,
the discussion began by trying to reach a common
understanding on how incumbent employees could be
guaranteed an interview if an application is submitted
in a timely manner. We feel there was some progress made
in this area. In addition there was a great deal of
discussion surrounding improving the chances of
placement for research professionals who are on lay off.
UMDNJ stated that they were planning to make us a
counter offer on economics as well as other items at our
next session, scheduled for July 10th.
Click here to review our contract proposals. [Make
hyperlink]
Membership Drive
We believe the more Full Members we have, the
stronger our union will be and the more leverage we
will have when negotiating with UMDNJ to get better
wages. If you are only an Agency Fee Payer, contact
our Membership Chair, Alicia Ashley, to join. Call
ext 5-9117 or email
ashleyaa@umdnj.edu. If you are already a Full
Member, please encourage your co-workers to join.
Together we can make our union stronger.
HPAE 5094 Flash Drives
In recognition of membership and participation,
our union is proud to offer all Full Dues paying
members a custom HPAE 5094 1GB USB Flash Drive.
Only full members will be eligible to receive
this one-time benefit. In order to receive your
HPAE Flash Drive you must attend a union meeting
or participate in some other union activity. The
flash drives will be distributed on a first come
first serve basis. Only one per full member
while supplies last.
Budget News: Charity Care
Governor Corzine and the legislature have
reached agreement on a $32.8 billion state
budget for 2009. $50 million of the $143 million
in hospital funding cuts are being restored and
hospital subsidies will exceed $950 million. At
this time there is no indication what if any
changes are being made to the Charity Care
formula.
Public Employee Pension and Benefits Update
Proposed changes in the NJ Legislature to Public
Employee Pension and Beznefits would have
diminished benefits that state workers
negotiated through collective bargaining and
fought to obtain. While legislators took action
to deal with abuse of the pension system, the
“solutions” crafted threatened to harm
hard-working members instead.
As originally proposed, the legislation
would have render anyone working less than
35 hours as part-time and ineligible for
health benefits or participation in the
state pension plan; increase the retirement
age from 60 to 62; recalculate the pension
payout based on 5 years instead of 3 years;
and limit pensions to one job. After Senate
and Assembly Budget Committee meetings late
June, and pressure from public employee
unions, part-timers who work 20 hours will
remain eligible for health benefits. Newly
employed part-timers will have new pension
eligibility requirements to work 500
hours/year or earn $10,000. The Pension
retirement age will be increased from 60 to
62 for new state employees, but the pension
formula will be based on the current 3-year
average, not the 5-year average that was
threatened.
President’s Message
Your
support and that of the entire professional staff is
critical to achieving our goals at the bargaining table
and we are off to a great start. The contract
survey was completed by almost 1000 members, a
tremendous improvement over the 250 completed surveys
collected two years ago. Your negotiation team used the
results obtained from the survey to prepare the
proposals for the wage re-opener. These proposals
were presented and endorsed at well-attended membership
meetings in Newark, New Brunswick, Piscataway and
Stratford. The results of the survey were as
follows:
-
We
want a fair wage increase.
-
We
do not feel we are fairly compensated for
our experience and job responsibilities.
-
We
do not feel our wages have kept up with
the cost of living.
-
We
are not happy at the prospect of paying for
our health insurance.
-
We
support negotiating for supplemental
retiree health benefits.
-
We
support improving opportunities for
internal job applicants.
-
We
support limiting UMDNJ’s ability to
subcontract work.
Your
negotiation team will be asking for your support during
the course of these negotiations in many ways (button
days, petition drive, rallies, membership meetings
etc.); please participate. A visibly supportive
and involved membership adds clout to our positions at
the bargaining table and increases our chances for a
fair agreement.
Submitted by: Thomas Murphy, Co-President Newark
Campus
WHO’S WATCHING
THE CONSULTANTS?
We see some changes within hospital procedures,
but are they good and effective? Nothing locks
people in error as much as the daily repetition of
error. Who is challenging these procedures, are
there any front line people helping in the decision
making of these new policies? I hope realization
comes quick to the executives in charge that there are
business consultants, business health consultants, and
that there is a major difference between the two.
Which do we have???
At UMD we have a great deal of equipment classified as
“high priority,” meaning the manufacturer is the only
place you can buy replacement parts. Our new
purchasing procedures require us to try to get three
bids (this takes 3 to 4 weeks.) Then, when the
obvious happens, you are allowed to request a waiver.
Finally, the part is ordered and takes another 1 to 2
weeks to arrive; leaving life saving equipment out of
service for about 4 to 6 weeks. Can someone tell
me why the bidding process is necessary if the
manufacturer is the only place you can purchase the
part?
We realize some parts of the hospital’s business
procedures needed a major upgrade, as the business
health world dictates, but not all as a regular
business. Looking at some of the decisions that
have been made it’s intuitively obvious to the most
casual observer that the thought process was absent.
Many of the new procedures will endanger patient care,
which shows the consultants have no known background in
health care, not a clue.
Nevertheless, if the hospital wants to lose the bad
reputation it better look carefully at the decisions
these consultants are making. UMD should make sure
that front-line employees are heard – technicians,
nurses and other professionals who know the best ways to
solve the problems that pertain to patient care.
Submitted by: Samuel McVay
|