The so-called “public option” was jettisoned from the health law by a handful of conservative Democrats in the Senate in 2009. Every Democrat’s vote was needed to pass the bill in the face of unanimous Republican opposition.
But in a “special communication” article published on the website of the Journal of the American Medical Association, the president said a lack of insurance plan competition in some areas may warrant a new look.
“Now, based on experience with the ACA, I think Congress should revisit a public plan to compete alongside private insurers in areas of the country where competition is limited,” Obama wrote.
The president also called on Congress to take more steps to rein in the cost of prescription drugs and make government assistance more generous for those who still cannot afford health coverage, while urging the 19 states that have not yet expanded the Medicaid program under the health law to do it.
The public option has been a point of controversy from the start. It was included in the version of the health law passed by the House, and had support from most Democrats in the Senate, before it was dropped. Many liberals hoped — and conservatives feared — that having the government provide insurance alongside private companies would be a step toward a full government-run system.
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton — under pressure from Sen. Bernie Sanders’ call for a single-payer government system — in February endorsed the idea of including a public option to allow people age 55 and older to purchase Medicare coverage. On Saturday, as part of a deal with Sanders, Clinton announced she will also “pursue efforts to give Americans in every state in the country the choice of a public-option insurance plan,” which is broader than what Obama is endorsing.
But even if Clinton wins and the Democrats take back control of Congress in November, a true public option remains a political longshot.
The article, titled “United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps,” is apparently the first by a sitting president published by the prestigious medical journal.
It includes a justification for the health law, statistics on how its implementation has improved both insurance coverage and health care quality, as well as recommendations for further action.
Kristie Canegallo, the White House deputy chief of staff for implementation, told a group of health reporters that the article grew out of a comprehensive review of the law ordered by the president late last year.
The review was to look at “what’s working, what’s not, and what we should do about it,” she said. Upon receiving the review, she added, Obama “thought it was important to share some of this publicly.”
Among those parts of the law the administration says are working are the coverage provisions. “The number of uninsured individuals in the United States has declined from 49 million in 2010 to 29 million in 2015,” the president wrote.
The article also claims that the health law has played a substantial role in slowing the rate of health spending.
“While the Great Recession and other factors played a role in recent trends, the [president’s] Council of Economic Advisers has found evidence that the reforms introduced by the ACA helped both slow health care costs growth and drive improvements in the quality of care,” says the article.
Jason Furman, chairman of the council, told reporters at the briefing that the continuing slow growth in health spending so many years out from the recession makes the argument that the economy is mostly responsible for the slowdown “absurd at this point.”
While most of the piece is a chart-driven, footnoted recitation of the impact of the health law, Obama did use his perch to suggest the current state of politics in Washington threatens progress going forward.
“Any change is difficult, but it is especially difficult in the face of hyperpartisanship,” he wrote. “Republicans reversed course and rejected their own ideas once they appeared in the text of a bill that I supported.”
Republicans, however, are continuing their assault on the health law. Just last week, two House Committees released a joint investigative report and held two hearings asserting that the administration is illegally providing funds to help lower-income individuals pay for their health coverage.
The claim is also the subject of a lawsuit currently in federal court.
The White House, however, remains unimpressed with by the claim.
“The Department of Justice … has made clear we have a permanent appropriation for this,” said Canegallo.